Open Mixtral 8x22b
Mistral AI
At a glance
- Price per 1M tokens (input)
- $2.00
- Price per 1M tokens (output)
- $6.00
- Context
- 65,336 tokens
- Free access
- yes (see below)
Refreshed daily; data verified August 15, 2026. Published August 12, 2026.
Open Mixtral 8x22b is a sparse mixture-of-experts model designed for developers and enterprises that need reliable function calling—the ability to have the model invoke external APIs or tools as part of a conversation. It suits tasks like workflow automation, database queries, and multi-step reasoning where structured outputs matter. Mistral AI’s approach emphasizes efficiency by activating only a subset of the model’s parameters per token, balancing performance with compute cost. This model is a strong fit for teams building agentic applications that require precise, tool-driven interactions without heavy fine-tuning.
Specifications & pricing
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 |
|---|---|
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $6.00 |
| Context window | 65,336 tokens |
| Max output | 8,191 tokens |
| Capabilities | tool calling |
LiteLLM community dataset (MIT), verified August 15, 2026. Official Mistral AI pricing.
What Open Mixtral 8x22b would cost on your workload — run it through the cost calculator →
Where to try Open Mixtral 8x22b for free
- Mistral AI offers a free chat — Le Chat (free plan). A vendor's free chat may run a different model from the same family — the exact model is not guaranteed.
Frequently asked questions
What is Open Mixtral 8x22b best used for?+
It excels at tool calling, meaning it can decide when and how to call external functions like search APIs, calculators, or internal services. This makes it ideal for building assistants that need to fetch live data, update records, or trigger actions. It also handles complex reasoning and code generation well, especially when tasks involve multiple steps.
How do I get started with this model?+
You can access it through major cloud platforms or Mistral’s own API. The model supports standard OpenAI-compatible endpoints, so you can plug it into existing applications with minimal code changes. For tool calling, you define functions in your request, and the model returns structured arguments for you to execute.
How does it differ from other models in the Mixtral line?+
Compared to smaller Mixtral models, this version offers greater capacity and improved instruction following, which translates to better performance on complex tool-calling scenarios. It also has a larger context window than some siblings, allowing it to handle longer conversations or documents. Unlike dense models of similar size, it uses a sparse architecture, so it is more compute-efficient during inference.
What are its limitations?+
It is not a replacement for specialized fine-tuned models in narrow domains. Tool calling can be imperfect—occasionally it may hallucinate arguments or miss a required call. The model also has a finite context window, so very long histories may need summarization. Additionally, it requires careful prompt design to get reliable function-call syntax.
Compare with others

Org chart: how to move your company onto AI
A practical map: which company roles and processes AI agents can take over, where to start, and in what order to roll it out.